The Evolving Role of a Community Manager (Part 2)

June 10th, 2008 Tom Diederich

I mentioned in Part 1 that community managers require a broad range of experience and wear a lot of hats in the course of their jobs. To me this is what makes the job so interesting. We must draw upon everything we’ve ever leaned both personally and professionally — and we’re always learning things that we put into practice. There is no “status quo.”

No two community managers have exactly the same job description (as many of you shared in the comments from my last post). And most of us add to our responsibilities as new opportunities are identified (most from conversations with our specific community).

Let’s look at my previous gig as an example.

When I joined Symantec in 2006, the company’s public Web site housed a forgotten area of discussion forums inherited from the 2005 purchase of Veritas Software. Launched in 2003, the Veritas Architect Network (VAN) was a peer-to-peer community for business customers, mainly functional IT managers. Most of the discussions were support related and “How do I” questions.

In addition to peer-to-peer discussion forums, VAN featured the (very) occasional white paper and links to various resources within veritas.com.

Veritas didn’t have a full-time community manager and content was stale. Discussions were seldom moderated. Links to resources became broken over time.

Worst of all, Symantec wasn’t learning anything from the forums and wasn’t sharing anything with the community.

As the new kid in town, many of the employees I spoke with from product and support teams had never even heard of VAN. My job as a full-time community manager was to breathe life back into the forums and map out a 2.0 version of the community under the Symantec brand.

Here’s what I did over the first couple of weeks on the job:

  • Introduced myself on the forums: “Hello, we’ve finally joined the conversations!”
  • Identified a handful “power users” who were very active on the boards even with no love from Symantec (up until then, anyway).
  • Built a private area for these power users to allow them to talk among themselves — and with me.

This private forum was instrumental in re-launching the community. We had daily conversations, starting with: “What should we call it and what features, in addition to discussion forums, should this new community offer?”

We decided to ask the community through a series of polls and discussions within the forums. The power users helped shape the discussions and the polls. The community eventually picked the name, “Symantec Technology Network,” along with the new elements within its walls: Expert blogs, videos and white papers.

I literally sketched out my vision of the site on a piece of paper. Once the napkin-sketch blueprints were in place, over the next four months I had to:

  • Choose a new forums/blog platform (working with IT).
  • Get my sketch turned into schematics -– then get it built (working with support, product management, the forums/blog vendor, the Web design team, IT …).
  • Convince product management and support that listening to — and participating in — customer conversations via the forums would be worth their while.
  • Recruit a small army of Symantec bloggers (no easy task … I am doing that now at Cadence).
  • Create an editorial calendar for white papers and videos.
  • Lay down the following law in stone:Thou Shall Not (and I will not allow you to) Delete Negative Posts!”

OK, this post is getting long so I’ll wrap it up in Part 3. :-)

Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)

    |     Email This Page Email This Page
Subscribe to Conversations Matter: Bridging the Social Media Gap Did you enjoy this post? If so, please subscribe to our RSS feed

5 Comments

MyAvatars 0.2 David Alston
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 7:32 am
1

Great post Tom. What platform did you end up choosing for your private community area? I’m looking into doing the same. Thanks.

David

MyAvatars 0.2 Tom Diederich
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 8:35 am
2

Thanks, David. At Symantec, we went with Lithium. It was a tough choice between them and Jive Software. We also looked at LiveWorld and Web Crossing. In the end, IT tipped the scales because they liked Lithium’s ability to meet a long list of technical requirements, including the ability to tie in with the company’s single sign-on requirements.

MyAvatars 0.2 David Alston
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 8:42 am
3

Awesome. Thanks for sharing this Tom. I’ll have to make a note of all of the ones you mentioned and check them out. Appreciate it.

Cheers David

MyAvatars 0.2 Tom Diederich
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 8:50 am
4

You bet. Feel free to shoot me an email or call me if you want more info. :)

MyAvatars 0.2 Brent Sheets
Thursday, June 12th, 2008 at 11:30 am
5

I’m the community manager for a community devoted to IT pros. I couldn’t agree more with the importance of engaging the “power users” within the community. It really is critical for a successful community to thrive and grow. Good post. Thanks.

What do you think? Join the conversation...





Blog World Featured Speaker